letter from J.P. Mills to J.H. Hutton
|text:||I have made further very careful enquiries about the Lhota phratries. Some people regard them as all equal. Those who give any order place them (1) Tompyahtserre (2) Izumontserre and (3) Mipongsandri. The list is as follows, the column on the left showing what women of that clan are called. As you will see there is a good deal of confusion.|
|text:||No one can explain to me why Ezong should be the exception it is.|
|text:||I shall more or less rewrite this part of my monograph. When can I have your note - on origins? I will let you know about the corresponding clan to Tsoiothui as soon as I can.|
|text:||The traditional derivations of the phratry names are as follows:|
_____________________________burnt_was_to_be seen from afar.
|text:||You probably know that there is a strong tradition that some of the Lhotas at least came from the N.W. - from a place called Lengka, the locality of which is unknown. They split off from the 'Assamese' and came up into the hills. The long daos (yanthang) are definitely connected with these 'Assamese'. They also recognise the Tukomi-Sangtams as brothers and the use of axe-shaped daos (Tsonak) is still remembered.|
|text:||Many thanks for the fourth part of the monograph which I got today.|